A Return on Investment analysis will illustrate the cost saving
potential of the BuildingWorks product suite to your organization.
Design Team (Architects & Engineers)
American Institute of Architects Best Practices state document retention and consistent procedures can aid architects in any legal proceedings arising from disputes or claims
Used by the architectural firms as a “standard” tool that catalogs only those essential documents that reflect the judgments, formal decisions or official acts.
May help lower professional liability insurance premiums
CAD file retention is readily available
Changes can be added creating an architectural history of the facility
Improves quality of closeout documentation given at the end of the project
Improves the communication and trust between the architect and the client
Subcontractor now knows, on a “per piece” basis, what information is required
Datasphere process “tracks” when all final information is submitted to Contractor
Provides a reliable “holding place” for As-Built information and final paperwork; allowing the subcontractor to confidently move to next job
Subcontractor now responsible for a single copy of information to be submitted; no more need for multiple copies and/or costly reproduction of documentation
No need to task staff members with time-consuming documentation
A Return on Investment analysis will illustrate the cost saving potential of the BuildingWorks product suite to your organization.
Design Team (Architects & Engineers)
- American Institute of Architects Best Practices state document retention and consistent procedures can  aid architects in any legal proceedings arising from disputes or claims
 
- Used by the architectural firms as a     “standard” tool that catalogs only those essential documents that  reflect the judgments, formal decisions or official acts.
 
- May help lower professional liability insurance premiums
 
- CAD file retention is readily available
 
- Changes can be added creating an architectural history of the facility
 
- Improves quality of closeout  documentation given at the end of the project
 
- Improves the communication and trust  between the architect and the client
 
topOwners and Managers
- Complete and Accurate record of the building
 
- Eliminates time spent tracking down information to perform maintenance and repairs
 
- Information on mission critical equipment has been verified and documented -- no more re-verification and/or unnecessary delays
 
- Better communication with Service Providers
 
- Building information can be transferred to Facility Management system, obviating the need for manual re-entry
 
- When contemplating a sale of the building -- due diligence is nearly complete 
 
topContractors
-  Standardization of closeout for all projects; i.e.: Better deliverable to client
 
- Verification of the approved information---a 3rd set of eyes— for the O & M’s
 
- Accurate and clean information submitted to owner (Research indicates that 20 to 30 % of  traditional closeout information is wrong, or incomplete)
 
- Flexibility of system allows Contractor      to keep any and all records of their choosing
 
- Provides documentation/validation of      Subcontractor’s delivery of all required information
 
- Negates need for Contractor to “chase”      information from the Subcontractor(s)
 
- Project manager may move on to next job;      while Building Works finishes project closeout
  
topSubcontractors
- Subcontractor now knows, on a “per piece”      basis, what information is required
 
- Datasphere process “tracks” when all      final information is submitted to Contractor 
 
- Provides a reliable “holding place”  for      As-Built information and final paperwork; allowing the subcontractor to  confidently move to next job
 
- Subcontractor now responsible for a  single copy of information to be submitted; no more need for multiple       copies and/or costly reproduction of documentation
 
- No need to task staff members with      time-consuming documentation
 
Back to the TOP